Archive for March, 2008
2008 Georgia Technology Summit
NOTE: We’re pleased to have a recent hire write about her impressions of the recent Techology Association of Georgia GTS ‘08 Summit. And now, here’s Tiffani.
Being one of the new staff members roaming the halls here at Vendormate, I was thrilled to be asked to represent the company at the Technology Association of Georgia (TAG) 2008 Georgia Technology Summit (GTS ‘08) a couple of weeks ago. This was especially fun because Vendormate was selected for the 2nd year in a row as a Top 40 Innovative Technology Company in Georgia by TAG.
In keeping with the “Best of” theme, here were my Top 3 moments of the day.
1. Michael Gelb, author of ”Innovate Like Edison” and “How to Think Like Leonardo da Vinci”. I felt that his presentation was fantastic & highly relevant to anyone who wants to thrive in a rapidly changing environment. By explaining how Thomas Edison’s process of systematic innovation was actually his greatest invention, Michael drew parallels to how we can use that in our daily lives and really increase our creative output.
2. Tech High Fieldtrip Group. Throughout the day I had quite a few Tech High students come visit our booth. Each student seemed truly interested in learning more about how our technology worked, asked very intelligent questions to help enhance their understanding, and overall were an incredibly delightful addition to the GTS ‘08.
3. Spark IP. Our neighbors down here at the ATDC have a sweet online application that helps the scientific community & innovators exchange intellectual property. With more than 5900 licensable technologies, “the site allows users to gain a better understanding of patented technology and how new innovation can be created, protected and marketed.” The parallel between their business and ours — of managing information not widgets — is obvious. It will be interesting to watch them grow!
Add comment March 24, 2008
Why Do Hospitals Struggle to Run Like a Business?
We’ll join in with Michael Lamoureux and his SourcingInnovation blog featuring healthcare this week, in opining that of all industries, healthcare has great opportunity to benefit from eProcurement.
In my opinion, Healthcare Materials Management professionals have the toughest job in all of supply chain management. These professionals could only wish that their job was merely to find the best products at the best prices. Unfortunately they have many more pressing factors that dictate their daily activities and purchasing decisions, and it’s the combination of these factors that would make the centralizing and automation of eProcurement particularly beneficial. Here are just a few of the complicating factors that trouble hospital materials managers.
# 1 Compliance
Hospital Materials Management professionals have a myriad of regulatory and compliance requirements that put a strain on their operations, staff and resources.
To start with, unique government regulations burden hospital materials management professionals by requiring collecting data and modifying processes.
-
Stark Law/Anti Kick back Statute
-
OIG Medicaid/Medicare Fraud/Sanction List
-
OFAC (Patriot Act)
-
FDA/USDA Recall Management
-
Pandemic/Epidemic Readiness
Few other industries have to deal with these uncoordinated requirements. Each one is an independent initiative. On top of that, these and other regulations begin to impact not just who the hospital does business with but also who can come into the facilities.
For example, vendor representatives that have access to procedural areas are required to provide immunizations documentation, product competency information, HIPPA/privacy policy acknowledgements and Operating Room safety documentation prior to gaining access. Failure to capture and monitor these thousands of documents from hundreds of representatives that are coming and going from year to year puts the hospital at risk of failing internal/external audits that can jeopardize Medicare/Medicaid reimbursements.
#2 Reimbursement Dependency
Do not underestimate the importance of Medicare/Medicaid reimbursements. Hospitals across the nation are suffering from revenue that does not keep pace with the rising cost of service. Increasingly stringent and flat levels of reimbursement from Medicaid, Medicare and insurance companies continue to erode hospital revenues and jeopardize the solvency of many health systems; however, the vendors selling to hospitals continue to report rising revenue and earnings year over year.
The documentation – of compliance, of diagnostic codes, etc. – means the inflows and outflows of cash are not as simple as purchase order to invoice to payment. A slip in any one of the steps leads at best to a dispute with Medicaid, Medicare and insurance companies. At worst, it’s a law suit.
#3 Taking Advantage of a Fragmented Space
There are over 5,000+ hospitals in the United States. This means a large percentage of a hospital’s supplier base and subsequent spend is with vendors that are significantly larger than the hospital. Individual hospitals have little negotiating leverage for pricing or service. Add the fact that many medical devices and drugs are sole sourced due to the proprietary nature of these technologies, hospitals are beholden to the suppliers despite the fact that hospitals are the largest distribution channel for those same suppliers.
Group Purchasing Organizations (GPOs) have stepped in to play a role in reducing costs. Hospitals are typically members of at least one GPO. Just as the name suggests, these GPOs reduce hospital costs by aggregating the spend of their participating hospital members. However, these organizations have squeezed the suppliers and most GPOs are realizing that you can only squeeze so much blood out of a turnip. Therefore, they are now attempting to deliver value tools to enable hospitals to more efficiently manage their operations. Time will tell if GPOs can morph their place in the hospital supply change and deliver on the promise of being a trusted advisor rather than just a middle man for gloves and gauze pads.
#4 Physician Preference Items
As Dave Stephens of Coupa explained in an earlier post, managing the complexity of physician preference items where patient care can be impacted is a restriction that is unique to healthcare purchasing. Frequently, Physician Preferred items take precedence over cost savings, innovation, and efficiencies. Unfortunately, these items may be tied to conflicts of interest that are difficult to uncover and monitor. Is that same “more senior physician” Dave mentioned in his post, choosing to continue to use plaster casts because it is in the best interest of patients and quality of care? Or has the physician neglected to take on more innovative products from other vendors because the existing vendor of plaster casts takes him to elaborate “education sessions” in Lake Tahoe every year? Who knows?
#5 And a Mint on the Pillow
A few months back, I heard from one doctor that said his hospital is moving away from calling patients “a patient” and using the term “customer”. Wow!!!! That is a change of philosophy that might not be the in the best interest of patient care. Sure, individuals have to take charge of their healthcare and become educated consumers of these services. But the phrase “the customer is always right” doesn’t jive when dealing with patient care issues. Physicians are making life and death decisions based on years of experience and education and shouldn’t have to debate with a patient’s “WebMD, Google search, Super Bowl ad self diagnosis and prescription.”
Vendors are a necessary and critical extension of the health system and therefore place a delicate balance on vendor/buyer/doctor/patient relationships that require greater scrutiny. If eProcurement can eliminate some of the distractions – by holding down costs so that more people can receive quality care, by documenting compliance and sniffing out conflicts of interest – then the benefit of moving to this model can not be denied.
Add comment March 13, 2008
Or Else, What?
Worn out with the exasperation that only children can cause, I announced a new house rule of prepping all the bookbags and school equipment before bedtime and invoked the most dire consequence, “OR ELSE.”
It had the desired effect… at least for the moment. The bookbags and jackets were by the door, ready to go the next morning. But the next night, jackets, bags, and papers were scattered throughout the house like blaze marks on a trail.
It’s an important reminder as new policies are written. “Or else” isn’t an incentive.
UMass Memorial Medical has announced some of the most stringent barriers between physicians and makers of medical devices and pharmaceuticals. Announced the week before Christmas and reported in The Boston Globe, these guidelines equate to no-free-lunch, no-gift, and no-free-samples directly to the decision-making staff. The policy applies to all doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and clinical staff. This policy goes beyond the common “disclosure” requirements of a relationship between a doctor and a medical marketer to an arm’s length requirement. Doctors serving research or consulting roles for a pharmaceutical company can not serve on the formulary committee for that drug.
It’s all designed to make the healthcare system be like Ceaser’s wife — above reproach.
UMass isn’t the first. It’s the latest in a string. University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine reported its own program in PITTMED magazine. Its program, which went into effect in mid-February, was praised by David Rothman of the Prescription Project because it includes “unabiguious enforcement mechanisms.”
Our Take: It’s the enforcement mechanism that policy makers sometimes overlook. What are the consquences of non-compliance? Some individual reps are bristling at the rise in vendor registrations. They misinterpret these programs as a creative revenue source for healthcare providers. They wonder aloud what will happen if they don’t participate. Will it be a brief “tsk-tsk” and then business as usual? Will their direct customers open the back door and let them in? Don’t create a policy. Create a program that addresses your concerns and with rewards or repercussions depending on participation.
2 comments March 7, 2008

